Thanks to my friend/fellow civic activist Anne for sharing the article that sparked these musings. (The original post is from a page called Architecture Lab which I follow on Facebook.)
The post talks about how the renowned urban-planning activist Jane Jacobs (author of the famous book The Death and Life of Great American Cities — which to this day is still required reading for many planners) was herself a cyclist, and believed that car-dependency actually fosters sociopathic tendencies.
And the post makes reference to a 1960s essay by Jacobs, titled “Cyclist.” I need to look it up.
My thoughts on just the post:
Sociopathic might sound like a really extreme label.
But then again, the degree to which we have normalized individualism in our society, and the degree of the individualism, those things are very deeply dysfunctional.
I’m not sure if I’d label it sociopathic or psychopathic, but it does feel pretty far along the scale.
For example, we just very casually choose to live far away from the people we love the most. If that’s not nuts, I don’t know what it is?
And from there it just escalates into just knowing that we can hop on a plane any time to visit friends & family, and we do, with a murderous vengeance.
Note, as with most all of my other content, when I say “we,” I am referring to my general age cohort and demographic, which is white Boomers.
And then sometimes that whole mentality leads us to thinking it’s a good idea to have multiple houses in multiple cities, those who can afford such a thing. Which even more deeply contributes to the erosion of community. Again, feels kind of sociopathic to me.
I used to think of it as options, when I was younger. Now I realize it’s a deadly feature of capitalism.
And on a personal note, as I get older and face a lonely old age (compounded by my “bad choice” of choosing not to have children) I’m not so sure. A lot of times we can’t go back to the places and people we have left. And yet we don’t fit in where we are. And the rush rush rush of car culture, and the distances between us, are a big part of the emptiness & sparseness of interactions.
And then there’s the whole “dependence on fossil fuels” component. (And now also lithium etc for electric cars.) Definitely sociopathic for us to trash the biosphere — our own life support system that is our only home — and just keep going.
Also: I once read there was a study that showed that when people who get around by bicycle, but also drive, get behind the wheel of a car, they instantly become just like any other impatient motorist. Whereas when they were on their bicycles they were more patient, calm, generally in a better mood. I have absolutely found that to be the case. I have watched myself do it.
On a personal note: I just spent a weekend in my old college town. A person can actually get around by foot or bicycle and just blend in, not be considered some sort of weirdo, or delicate flower who needs to be fretted over and offered rides. There’s plenty of public transport too. And the distance just aren’t as spread out.
As it’s possible that chronic pain is becoming my new normal, I may need to move to a place that doesn’t worship private automobile ownership, just to maintain my own sanity and dignity.
Now, one might think that a person with chronic pain would be precisely that sort of delicate flower who would need rides everywhere. But an interesting thing happens when one lives in a dense walkable area, allowing daily basic needs to be met within a small radius. With tree-shaded streets, that have speed limits of 20 to 30 miles an hour as opposed to 40 or 45 or more. And ample public transport. In that kind of environment, a person doesn’t have to walk as far. So even if they have, say, chronic back pain, chronic knee ailment etc., they can get around and go about their day with a measure of independence.
Also, in that kind of environment, a person getting around on foot or bicycle doesn’t stand out. That’s a very important point of quality of life. It’s more than a little bit disconcerting to be standing out as “the person who walks or rides a bicycle.”
BTW everything that comes to me in life, becomes fuel for the collective. So, when I get injured, I incorporate that into my transportation activism. And as I get older and start the serious planning for aging-out of being able to take care of a whole house and yard, I have become more and more into housing activism. Especially watching the young people struggle with insane rents, when we had it so much easier because the housing ecosystem was healthier back then.
Not only do I not want to ever own a car again; I probably shouldn’t be driving at all. (I strive to be a good defensive driver, but I know my tendencies to get lost in thought.)
Neither should a lot of other people, but I don’t get to make that choice. At least I can choose it for myself, if I find a place where I can fit in without submitting to the burdens of private car ownership.
And a comment I added on a local note:
And speaking of which, East ISB, the so-called great FDOT improvement project, is an absolute nightmare for anyone on foot or bicycle. Anyone not in a car.
Yesterday as I was riding back across the bridge from home, I just broke down in tears of frustration. I know the project’s not finished yet but I don’t foresee it getting any more bikeable, walkable, etc. They have basically boxed us into the neighborhood, Suburban gated-community, one-way-in style. It’s bad for motorists too.
Added later: actually, a friend who walked over the bridge yesterday said he had felt good and safe. So maybe it’s mainly just bad for bicyclists or anyone trying to turn across the street into the neighborhoods. Of course, pedestrians might end up having to jaywalk.
Further exploration:
• “Jane Jacobs: A Pioneer Urbanist and Cyclist.” (Anton Giuroiu; Architecture Lab; https://www.architecturelab.net/jane-jacobs-a-pioneer-urbanist-and-cyclist/ ) “… She added, ‘The car is not only a monstrous land-eater itself: it abets that other insatiable land-eater—endless, strung-out suburbanization.’ Foreseeing decades of suburban sprawl, Jacobs criticized car dependency and its impacts on land use. Her analogy of drivers as centaurs — half-men, half-vehicles — suggested cars made people less human in their interactions. …”